i referenced the wiki, where it is easier to sort though different releases.
Right as the title states it is the GK208 GPU being the kepler GT630. The earlier models used more power, and had a heap less CUDA cores as well. If yours is the new Kepler based one, then 25w seems correct. Well the card im using im more inclined to think it is more of a HTPC card then anything with a 25watt power usage and DDR3 ram. Remember that these cards were aimed at gamers not for crunching Why do you think new cards come online like popcorn? It aint for crunching home. though looking at the TDP, it is quite a bit higher vs what im looking at. like some have pointed out to me at another forums why not get the GTX750 at that point it doesnt cost that much more. with the higher number of TMU and ROP's on the GT740, i wonder what it might do.Ĭost of the new GT740 is near what a GT640 gDDR5 costs. though on my current GT630 rev 2 you may not want to, due to im still seeing about a 83-87% usage on the gpu.
#GPU Z POWER CONSUMPTION HOW TO#
someone talked about running more then one on the GPU, still havent figured out how to do this. though from what im seeing, SETI GPU wu's dont use that much ram. the GT740 is still around $80-100 look at them online, you can get the new GT740 with up to 4gb of ram. TDP is down, GT640 rev 1 at 75watts, the GT740 at 64watts, both with Gddr5 ram. being used on NV's newly relased GT740, comparing specs of it vs the GT640 rev1. Now that i see a replacement for the GT640 Rev2 cards, the new name but an older GK107-452-A2. since i start it up when needed now, i seen it showing 0% at all.
turns out the GPUZ shoing how gpu usage maybe have just been a glitch with gpuz. It finally broke 1000RAC!! rather impressive IMO compared to what the Intel Atom 330 was spitting out years ago. It may only be rated at 120 GFLOPS but it sure does seem to be making use of classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
#GPU Z POWER CONSUMPTION FULL#
Since my HD 6370m GPU runs around 96% I just figure it's full TDP rating of 11w as power usage. Then you could base your power usage off of that value. If you are leaving GPUz open in the background you change the display for GPU load to "average" instead of "current". if the numbers are even close to power usage, to me thats even better. that would be using the current rac listing of 1292r/17.5w and 1292r/20w. even assuming 70-80% tdp usage, 17.5-20watts on the card, which would then change the rac/watt to 73.8rac - 64.6rac. looking at whats been posted for % of tdp so far. if i had a kill-o-watt device i could try to figure it out. to figure my rac/watt all can use is listed nv spec of 25watts. now talking about power usage, since this card doesnt allow power usage via software. Its still climbing! just for the card only,its now up to 1,292rac. Which is is generally good classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours If you have a UPS with a power indicator, or an AC watt meter, you could use that to indirectly see the difference between idle & load on your components. However if you want to know power consumption you need to monitor the PCIe bus & the PCIe 12v connector at the same time like this. With the TDP value being "worst case scenario" it is often safe to just use the TDP value for power usage. The numbers from the stat sites indicate it will be around 1800 or so. i just dont see the same parts being used as if this was a game or other demanding 3D app. i will admit im not sure how much of the core it self is being used for GPGPU work for seti. The TDP normal is a full load of the entire core not just certain sections. since the part of the GPU being used is going to be different. GPU load has no correlation to TDP, without a TDP monitor its not going to be accurate. im simply looking at a single GPU numbers, no cpu work at all for seti. To the others that mentioned their RAC, those are total for your whole computer. I truely wonder where this thing is going to top out! currently at 1,491 RAC!! woots!!
0 kommentar(er)
